Iowa State University
Seed production following mowing in a summer annual
(or, How a Weed Beats Crop
Rotation)
by Bob Hartzler
![]()
December 16, 2005
- Waterhemp is a prolific seed
producer and can produce abundant seed under adverse conditions. A
simple study was conducted in 2004 to determine seed production by
waterhemp plants that emerged in oats and survived oat harvest in late July and
a mowing in mid-August. On Aug 20 fifty waterhemp plants were tagged
shortly after being mowed at a height of four inches.
Ten plants were harvested at weekly intervals and viable seed
per plant was determined. Only 50% of the plants had produced seed on the
first harvest date, resulting in an average of one seed per plant (Table 1).
However, further delays in mowing resulted in a rapid increase in seed produced.
Waterhemp plants averaged nearly 2000 seeds on four weeks following mowing.
Table 1. Seed production of waterhemp
growing in alfalfa following late-season
mowing.
| Harvest Date |
Plants with seed |
Height (Inches) | Number of seeds/plant |
| August 27 | 50% | 13 | 1 |
| September 3 | 100% | 19 | 250 |
| September 10 | 100% | 23 | 1905 |
Arce and Hartzler. 2004. Iowa State University.
The implications of
waterhemp's ability to rapidly produce seed was demonstrated on an on-farm study
in central Iowa. There is a general consensus that diverse rotations are
beneficial to weed management. The simplistic explanation for the rotation
benefit is that weeds are best suited for survival in crops with similar life
cycles. Thus, when a field is planted to summer annual crops such as corn
or soybeans, summer annual weeds such as foxtail and waterhemp will increase,
but perennial and winter annual weeds will be at a disadvantage and will decline
in severity. Rotations therefore help prevent any one particular weed
species, or type of weed, from increasing to densities that overwhelm control
tactics. However, as with most things, it's not quite that simple.
Researchers followed changes in
the seed bank on a central Iowa farm
using a 5-year rotation (Figure 1). The seed bank was sampled at the end
of the growing season during each phase of the rotation, and in all years the
seed bank was dominated by waterhemp. Contrary to dogma, the seed bank
declined during years the field
was
in corn and soybean, but skyrocketed when the field was planted to oats
underseeded with legume. The
farmer had developed a very effective
system for managing weeds in corn and soybeans, and was able to drive down the
seed bank during this phase of the rotation even though herbicides were not
used. The weak link in the rotation occurred during the year legumes were
established with an oat companion crop. Waterhemp was able to survive
oat harvesting, and
the underseeded
legume was not an effective competitor. Although the farmer intended to to
prevent weed seed production with mowing, the rapid increase in the seed bank
during this phase of the rotation
indicates this field operation was delayed too long.
There are distinct advantages to rotation in managing weeds, however, this study illustrates that good management is required in any cropping system to stay ahead of weeds.
Prepared by Bob Hartzler, extension weed management specialist, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University
| For
more information contact: ISU Extension Agronomy 2104 Agronomy Hall Ames, Iowa 50011-1010 Voice: (515) 294-1923 Fax: (515) 294-9985 http://www.weeds.iastate.edu |
Submit questions
or comments here.
Copyright © 1996-2006, Iowa State University, all rights reserved
|