Iowa State University

 

leftbar.JPG (7146 bytes) rightbar.jpg (2335 bytes)

Impact of late-season glyphosate treatments
on weed seed production
by Bob Hartzler

blueline.jpg (1822 bytes)

August  9, 2004
-  Each year in mid to late July weeds begin to poke their heads through the soybean canopy, therefore tempting farmers to load up the sprayer for one last trip across the field.  Although they realize much of the impact of the weeds on crop yields may have already occurred, they feel they may still be able to reduce weed seed production and reduce harvest problems.  This ariticle summarizes research investigating the impact of late-season applications on weed seed production (Clay, P.A. and J. L. Griffin.   2000.  Weed seed production and seedling emergence responses to late-season glyphosate applications.  Weed Sci.  48:481-486.).

Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted with cocklebur, hemp sesbania and sicklepod (the latter two species are problem weeds for soybean growers in the south).  Only results of cocklebur will be presented here since results were fairly similar among species.  Glyphosate was applied at three stages:  initial seed set - 75% of blooms had set burs; mid seed fill - burs fully elongated; physiological maturity - burs initiated dry down).  Roundup D-Pak was applied at 0.38, 0.56 and 0.75 lb ae/A  (equivalent to 1, 1.5 and 2 pt per acre of original Roundup).  The results of two field experiments are presented in Table 1.  Data are averaged over years and glyphosate rates since there were no interactions between these factors and application timing.  The earliest application of glyphosate reduced bur production by 75% and burs averaged only 20% of the weight of burs produced by control plants.  When application was delayed until burs were fully elongated or had reached maturity, the affect on seed production and viability was minimized.  Similar results were found in the greenhouse in that glyphosate had little impact on seed production once seed fill had initiated.

Application timing Burs per plant Bur size (mg) Seedling emergence
(% of untreated)
Untreated 270 172 100
Initial seed set 70 36 18
Mid seed fill 220 145 83
Physiological maturity 270 150 94
LSD 30 11 12

Researchers at Iowa State University studied the effect of late-season 2,4-D treatments in corn on the seed production of cocklebur and velvetleaf (Elizabeth Green Lorch and Dick Fawcett, 1983, Iowa State University).  2,4-D was applied at 0.5 to 1 qt/A at several corn stages from V11 to the dent stage.  Little effect was observed on weed seed production or viability when applications of 2,4-D were delayed until seed capsules or burs were present at application timing.  If applications were made prior to seed set, the productivity of the weeds was greatly reduced.  Seed production was reduced more effectively in cocklebur than velvetleaf because cocklebur initiated flowering at later dates than velvetleaf.

The adoption of Roundup Ready technology has made late-season treatments more attractive because of minimal potential for crop injury (except for wheel tracks) and the ability of glyphosate to control large weeds.  However, the potential value of these late season treatments should be carefully evaluated prior to committing to spraying.  Keep in mind that much of the impact on yields will have already occurred, thus little yield benefit is likely to be achieved.  If the weeds have not initiated seed set at the time of application it should be possible to reduce seed production.   However, if the fruiting structure is visible it is unlikely that killing the weeds at this late date will influence seed production or viability of the seed.  Many people think that late-season treatments will reduce the viability of seeds that are produced, but research has consistently shown that seeds that have been initiated at the time of application are unlikely to be greatly influenced.  The other possible benefit of the late season treatments is harvesting efficiency, and there may be situations where this may make the treatment worthwhile.

Prepared by Bob Hartzler, extension weed management specialist, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University

For more information contact:
ISU Extension Agronomy
2104 Agronomy Hall
Ames, Iowa 50011-1010
Voice: (515) 294-1923
Fax: (515) 294-9985
http://www.weeds.iastate.edu
This site designed and managed by Brent Pringnitz.
Submit questions or comments here.  

Copyright 1996-2003, Iowa State University, all rights reserved  

Common chemical and trade names are used in this publication. The use of trade names is for clarity by the reader. Inclusion of a trade name does not imply endorsement of that particular brand of herbicide and exclusion does not imply nonapproval.